<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CopperBridge Media Blog &#187; TweetDeck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.copperbridgemedia.com/blog/tag/tweetdeck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.copperbridgemedia.com/blog</link>
	<description>Bridging the Bytes...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:33:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Trademarking &#8216;Tweet&#8217; &#8211; Its not Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.copperbridgemedia.com/blog/trademarking-tweet-its-not-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.copperbridgemedia.com/blog/trademarking-tweet-its-not-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vince Buffon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CopperBridge Corridor!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TweetDeck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tweetmeme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copperbridgemedia.com/blog/?p=98</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who else would want to trademark &#8216;Tweet&#8217; ? Well, its not Twitter for sure. After a couple of tries, Twitter failed to trademark its own creation. Image Credit: www.trampolinebranding.com When Twitter requested for the reasons of denial &#8211; it was a surprise to them too. Apparently, many other companies had applied for trademarks of terms [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Who else would want to trademark &#8216;Tweet&#8217; ? Well, its not Twitter for sure. After a couple of tries, Twitter failed to trademark its own creation.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.copperbridgemedia.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/twitter-icon-31.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-101" title="twitter-icon-31" src="http://www.copperbridgemedia.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/twitter-icon-31.png" alt="twitter-icon-31" width="256" height="256" /></a></p>
<p><span style="color: #c0c0c0;">Image Credit: www.trampolinebranding.com</span></p>
<p><em><br />
</em></p>
<p>When Twitter requested for the reasons of denial &#8211; it was a surprise to them too.</p>
<p>Apparently, many other companies had applied for trademarks of terms which were very similar to &#8216;tweet&#8217;. According to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) &#8220;Other trademark applications by the firms TweetMarks, Cotweet and Tweetphoto, and said there was a &#8220;likelihood of confusion.&#8221; &#8221;</p>
<p>So, it seems that the followers have overtaken the leader as far as &#8216;tweet&#8217; is concerned, But Biz Stone, founder of Twitter was far from worried and even appreciated the legion of twitter related firms like TweetDeck, TweetMeme, Tweetie, BackTweets, Tweetboard -who have been instrumental in making &#8216;Tweet&#8217; a household name&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.copperbridgemedia.com/blog/trademarking-tweet-its-not-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

